When will the Dexit?
(the withdrawal of Germany from the EU)

If the Dexit nor prevent? How long you intend to hold to the thesis of a wealth-creating EU?


The EU can not save or reform it!
And that was exactly what I brought in a television interview for ARD unequivocally. Of course I also explains why this is so. Basically, every state is, after all (as long as there is no global wage and tax equality) rely on tariffs to protect its economy. Even Greece may sound, it would alleviate the pressure from imports on duties and thus enable the construction of an industrial base! A state that is at the mercy of unfair global competition dumping, can not exist in the long run. Whoever says otherwise does something to himself.
The other intractable deficits in the EU were addressed in the interview, I referred to the anti-democratic structure and the absurd bureaucracy. Beautiful speeches, all this really no longer be well. 28 national interests can not be reconciled. Who wants to deny that?

All this and much more is coming over convincing in the interview. That had traveled from afar TV crew was thrilled. Fears that the television superiors would not allow such an open statement against the EU, seemed unfounded. Because soon the critical EU research was announced with my interview in the official listings. But a few days before the broadcast probably a more powerful upper Indians must have pulled the ripcord (out of politics or in the ARD). All my passages were cut from the film and replaced with harmless (EU-friendly) propaganda. A rogue who thinks evil. In Germany there is no censorship? It would be nice.


Blind rapture ...
The lack of sincerity and openness in the media holds the large majority of the population from which to reflect more accurately about the EU. Thanks to tireless brainwashing she has internalized the EU as a matter of course. The question of the usefulness or raison d'être of the European Union does not arise most citizens. An outlet (a Dexit) they can not imagine (because the ubiquitous media propaganda does not allow such thoughts) is simple.
In the debate about the EU it should only go to reforms. This should gradually be clear after half a century of desperate efforts that the EU can not be reformed. Because even their basic principle is inconsistent, unrealistic and illogical (so are existing agreements and laws of Member States and the ECB so often ignored).


Anyone for a strong Europe, the EU can not approve!
It's all you ever noticed with which deceit and arrogance, the EU is constantly equated with Europe? As if there is no difference between the two terms. Switzerland, Norway and soon England about not part of Europe?
When it is said repeatedly, "Europe must be saved," so it goes many profiteers in truth only to the EU, more specifically about the preservation of their own sinecures (there are in Brussels alone thousand highly paid EU officials, EU lobbyists, etc. ).

Many people are so fond of their superstitions to the European Union that they no longer notice how much they hide the realities. How can assume only a Brussels supremacy with their insatiable excessive regulation could be the economy of the 28 EU countries serve? How can assume a democracy distant, seemingly inscrutable laws machinery would be helpful in the global competition of nations?


Mass unemployment and falling wages!
Even the German model state, real net wages and pensions have declined since 1980, although productivity has doubled in the selfsame period. And the number of unemployed has tripled despite all verschleiernder creative accounting since 1980! Will these sad trends perceived by the majority of the population? The constant cheering messages ( "Germany benefits particularly from the EU and the Euro!" Or "We never went there as good as today!") Form the basis of an unprecedented repression rhetoric. Factual arguments are nipped in the bud and do not penetrate into the consciousness of hearing authoritarian affluent citizens. EU critics denounced as democracy enemies, racist or yokels or deemed nagging spoilsport.


Only the cheap flood of money is currently preventing the collapse!
You do not deceive yourself: Only the high-risk low flood of money (which is not only irresponsible, I think) concealed the true extent of the impending disaster. Only thanks to the cheap flood of money many euro countries can keep their gigantic public debt still at bay. Only thanks to the cheap flood of money an artificial stimulus was created which concealed the true extent of the misery makeshift.
With the cheap flood of money you have but pulled the last trump, you have your sheet completely exhausted. If now bursting a heated by the cheap flood of money bubble, it gets really grim.
But anyway: In the long run, a cheap flood of money that lacks any monetary respectability and morality, not stand. Also because it goes against all principles of an efficient market economy.


Blind selfishness ...
The superstitious belief in the need for EU nurture entrepreneurs who are looking for the EU cheap labor for skilled workers. For allegedly not find any more in Germany.
That is to say: a shortage of skilled workers, there is only if wages are too low. Because of poor pay, some professions have become unattractive. Why truck drivers, Caregiver, artisan, doctor or whatever, if the payment does not meet the high performance requirements. As you look for but rather a more comfortable or socially more prestigious profession.

Immigrants from EU low-wage countries (Freedom) you needed only to maintain the level of wages in the shortage occupations low.
Entrepreneurs complain, higher wages are simply not there, the market did not exist here. This is of course complete nonsense. Because the market laws and the competitors are finally exposed. So if earning truckers more shipments were generally more expensive.
Thereby, the calculation base shifts slightly. The general centralization mania would somewhat weakened, but some relocation of production abroad would no longer be profitable, shipping packages for Internet orders were lifted.
At the same time social costs would be saved (in probably a much greater extent) because families with many children from the EU low-wage country (who often live on welfare in whole or in part) would not migrate after Germany.
In the media, these relationships are concealed. Since time is staged the complaints of poor entrepreneurs thousand who can not find people. It is apparently just about to underpin the EU's alleged necessity.


Germany lives of EU export?
At least a thousand times a year in the media, the claim is made, Germany was dependent As an exporting nation to the EU. Therefore, the prejudice holds also in neighboring countries persistently that we are the great beneficiaries (parasites) of the EU. This in turn stirs up the envy and resentment and also the entitlement to us. True but:
1. It does not need the EU to trade. Finally, Germany delivers its goods everywhere, even to distant China or the United States.
2. Trading in Europe was not invented with the EU, it was there before.
3. If there is a dependence on exports, it would be fruitful. Then foreign crises would immediately affect our economy. We have to live in constant fear, be inveigled into chaos with.
4. A responsible government should therefore always be striving to maintain its economic autonomy as much as possible. This ensures stability and security.


Either the Dexit or the EU comes collapses?
Most probably know the phrase "The EU does not work - it it because, Germany pays". The trouble is: Germany's resources are limited. And you will not be able to forever keep our majority with dubious success stories in check. The resistance in Germany against the EU will grow steadily. Since it helps little to mock the Internet as a fake news basis. At the end of critical citizens detects whether arguments are valid or not.
In order not to leave the field to the AFD, the established parties are back down over time, so be realistic (EU-critical). It is run similar to the mass immigration 2015/2016: First you reveled in the welcoming culture and then followed by disillusionment (foreclosure). Because the established parties were overtaken by reality.


President Macron talking about a reestablishment!
As you may also have noticed how much France's pro-EU president urges a start-up of the European Union. But what does this new foundation? Is it not to be seen as an admission of failure? It is hoped to make everything better on the next attempt?
But I am of the opinion there can be no EU that works in the long run. The contradictions are simply too big and too diverse the interests of EU countries. In a few decades we will have to admit to a renewed failure. Then follows another experiment? How often and how long EU citizens are to be put off and put off?
Will they ever acknowledge that the EU is a counterproductive monster that only serves the large global players and supports their expansion and monopolization cravings?


Dexit or dissolution of the EU?
The easier way would certainly be the Dexit. Because of his exit Germany can decide for themselves. The best is waiting to see how it goes with the United Kingdom and Gibraltar European Union membership referendum. Are the Brits without EU in a few years better off than before (which is expected), the withdrawal from the EU loses its horror and impudent propaganda duration lobbying EU loses its credibility.
An orderly resolution of the entire EU would indeed not bad, but it seems to me much less likely (because some States of the EU subsidy policy and the transfer union still hope for benefits).
There are of course a third option, namely the risk of the EU collapse. Trigger could be a Great Depression or the ECB, with its cheap flood of money the adventurous policy.


What the EU brings us all?
What are the main features of the EU. What distinguishes the community of conventional sovereign states?

• creating a single market, elimination of customs duties
core of the EU is the abolition of customs borders. But what brought about this change?
1. They exacerbated the wage and tax dumping. The European competition is unfair. How should insist on a permanent German SMEs when his rival abroad has only a fraction of the cost of labor?
2. beneficiaries are the big global players who just got easier much of their production can outsource the EU low-wage country.
3. The EU's internal market increases the sales markets of German and foreign global players. But make no mistake - this is not a win-win situation. Because in return regional producers out of the market. It is thus promoted the formation of monopolies.
4. The national companies have better opportunities in comparison to medium-sized companies to shirk tax payments (fraudulent evasion of VAT, shift profits to tax havens, etc.). Therefore, the tax burden of the population increases.
5. The outsourcing of production parts to cheap labor and the extinction of regional manufacturers multiply the volume of transport. The result: Significant increase in health and environmental damage.

• The EU creates open borders
What changes as a result?
1. commuters and tourists need to when crossing the border no longer identify. In theory, it saves a few minutes of time. In practice, however, the volume of traffic, which inhibits the flow of traffic and causing congestion increases because of the limitless freedom. So bottom line, no time is saved, it happens the opposite.
2. Open borders are gratefully accepted by criminals. Whose work is made much easier. Also because de prosecutions and convictions of foreign offenders is far more difficult.
3. Open borders open up the VAT door to fraud. Because for real or fake exports, there is a whopping refunds, while undeclared, smuggled goods are not hit by the VAT due.

• The Brussels Clause flood the economy burdened
Because EU bureaucrats think they have to take care of everything, the continent sinks into the rules garbage. This complicates not only the national legislation, it also burdens the citizens and especially the economy. The cost increases, decreases productivity. Particularly small and medium-sized enterprises are hardly meet the legal requirements.

• The escalating Subventionitis weakens the market economy
subsidies are not only expensive, they also lead to disastrous misallocation of the economy.
The EU uses subsidies as a gigantic propaganda program.
The beneficiaries believe they have to thank for the EU much. Each subsidy euro must be hard work. The anonymous taxpayer (the Paketauslieferer, bricklayers, retirees, geriatric nurse) has to grab some money from the meager income so that it can then be generous and often distributed without real control.

• The EU weakens democracy and political freedom
the voice of Maltesers or Luxembourger ten counts more than that of a German. Negotiations often in secret from the public, and in any case the EU's interdependent decision-making levels for the layman are inscrutable. It is a mockery when highly paid lobbyists drown, it would need the EU for respect for democracy.
In addition, the Brussels guardianship affect the capacity of national governments (80% of German laws are due to the EU).

• The EU instigate discord!
Even the pro-European French President Macron sees a European civil war in today's EU. Solidarity is rare everywhere egoism, envy and resentment is rampant spread.
And the autonomy of some regions are increasing. Would, for example, the Catalans or Scots want to secede from their mother country, if it were not for the EU? Certainly not!
Similarly, there was in Ukraine the split and the Civil War probably only because the country suddenly aspired to EU membership (while the Russian part of the population resisted).

• The EU gave us the euro
Even the most highly respected DM was abolished (against the will of the population). The euro-zone countries now missing by these same old currency to the economically most important management tool. An ailing euro country can no longer have a now regain its competitive devaluation, even an individual interest rate policy is excluded.
Where this madness leads, shows the real practice: Gigantic debt relief were necessary, the ECB sought refuge in a high-risk low flood of money (= creeping expropriation of savers and cancellation of private pensions), bought up even on a large scale government bonds and no longer restrained himself iron requirements and promise (the euro on was established). How to get out again from this number, obviously knows none. It is so far not even been able to open an interest-rate trend.

• Conclusion
Although the powerful lobbying EU (the media and "established" parties) nor glossed over as much to get around talking about the bush and smoke grenades raises: How can anyone think that the EU is necessary, useful or worth preserving at a correct discourse , Speakers but all key points against it.

The arguments against the all-powerful European lobby

• "The EU-Germany's withdrawal would lead to chaos in the financial markets."
This claim has actually been contradicted by the United Kingdom and Gibraltar European Union membership referendum. Where there is a mess? So it is the EU advocates just about spreading panic and to stir up fears. By bringing into play of all the financial markets as the main argument is more than bold: It is precisely the euro proves to be but as the epitome of adventurous monetary policy (with unknown output).

• is conjectured, a Dexit could lead to currency depreciation
and thus drive the inflation. Others fear the opposite, an appreciation of the DM, which would increase German exports.
Anyway (I believe appreciation probable): It's all tea leaves. In addition, currency fluctuations are quite normal and necessary. Because they help to balance the trade and current account. At this compensation should actually be located all trading partners.

• "Germany would probably lose its strong position as an economic power after a Dexit."
But this suspicion is contrary to any logic! If our state is not subject to the dictates of Brussels, if it can free itself from the European section tide with its counterproductive subsidy policy, then it's just an advantage!
Even more important: An independent, free state can protect itself on import tariffs (wage, tax, environmental and social dumping) against the European and global unfair competition. He may again have its own currency, is not supporting euro partners on debt relief and transfer huge sums to Brussels. It is then no longer also forced to participate in a ruinous, adventurous cheap flood of money.

Basically striking that the EU Panikorchester stoking fears with contingencies. It "could", "would be possible", etc .. Such rhetoric is little serious, because there is absolutely nothing that can not happen, "could" (the earth could tomorrow explode, collapse of the heavens above the earth, aliens "could " To conquer the world). It's less about what might not be all that is important, what is probable and can be expected under normal circumstances.

• Another theory: As an export nation, Germany was the main beneficiary of the EU.
And that is to say dare, even though it is known that in this country the wages and pensions since 1980 have fallen (in contrast to many other EU countries) and unemployment have increased tenfold in the last 50 years.
Again: Who exported much that needs to import much (a large imbalance is unacceptable in the long run). And a dependence on exports is far from desirable, it is not wealth-promoting. Because with the export delusion the country lives in a perpetual powder keg. Constantly have to fear of being overtaken by other countries and losing markets. And a global economic crisis gets double and triple to feel an "exporter".

• "The weak EU countries missing after the Dexit German development aid."
Poland, for example, gets on the EU annual net transfer of 15 billion euros. This sum could no longer be applied to a Dexit course. But would that be so bad? Finally, Poland's economy is suffering from the misallocation of subsidy policy.
Furthermore, Poland could also get out of the EU and thus get rid of the Brussels nannying and bureaucracy. That would be a huge clearance! As a truly sovereign state Poland would also be able to collect overdue protective tariffs to finally withdraw its industry from unfair global competition dumping.

• "Without access to the EU single market of 360 million consumers would be lost!"
Have sovereign countries such as Japan, China, the United States, United Kingdom about no longer have access to the EU, they can there is nothing more to sell? That would be news to me. How can you spread such nonsense!

• "58% of German exports go to EU countries."
Yes and now? It is not uncommon when there is a closer economic contact with neighboring countries. But this was so even before the EU and is common worldwide. And by veering Britain sinks flattering 58 -% - rate anyway significantly. I repeat again: exports two-way street, they (ie an import dependence) generally lead to correspondingly high imports.

• "The Dexit will weaken Europe!"
The Dexit will weaken the EU - but not Europe (these two terms are indeed love to be confused with each other). The Dexit would probably be the beginning of the end of the EU: The ominous Union would dissolve after leaving Germany sooner or later, the European nightmare would be finished.
This should significantly strengthen Europe. For all countries could have long since reached the German standard of living, they would be sovereign and could their economies on tariffs before the overwhelming competition of global players and the Far Eastern low-wage contries protect.

• "customs barriers and border controls could come back!"
That supposed to be a warning or a promise? The re-establishment of customs barriers and border controls is precisely the meaning of Dexit, that's the point. Because a sovereign, more capable state happens to be dependent on these common throughout the world standards to safeguard the fundamental rights.

• "Foreign investment funds would no longer flow to Germany!"
Why not? Germany is one of the most economically and politically stable countries in the world. And right here should be there any more money? Just ridiculous!

• "Anti-German resentment could boil again!"
The resentment has been around a long time, precisely because of the EU ! Because imagine cheated us many EU countries. Germany itself carries with his boastful propaganda of success to this false impression (supposedly low unemployment rate, high trade surplus, etc.).
After Dexit nobody could accuse us of a parasitism or fear, patronized by Mrs. Merkel or of being exploited. In order to improve its reputation in Europe continues Germany could generously awarded aid on the type of Marshall Plan. That would cheaper than the current EU transfers, would be more honest and certainly far more effective.


3: 97
Looking at it unemotionally, talk only about 3% of all serious arguments, but 97% against the EU. The sublime ramblings which raised transfiguration - all this turns out on closer inspection to be beguiling siren song.
Who one hand sounds (Macron), the EU "combines democracy with a market economy, individual freedom with social justice," the same time speaks of a European civil war ( "whose existence we do not want to admit") requires and one of the EU founding, has according to my feelings lost its credibility.

To be able to reform the (unreasonable) hope to stir up the EU but, I think the face of decades of experiments irresponsible! With the constant cobbler land, the EU is losing more and more bureaucratic astray. The euro z. As was once even begun to rescue the EU. And what did it end up as?
The EU is so complex that it is almost transparent and assessable in its entirety, at least for the average citizen. Each person sees something else underneath. Only from this mist and ignorance out the EU is still durable and can still keep reasonably in check popular anger. But Iinzwischen outed himself in Germany, one in three Germans as EU opponents.


"Get out of the EU" - why I wrote the book.
Certainly not to make money (the investment in the project, I will never ever again get in). I am, however, keen to see the eternal whitewashing and the rape of truth finally comes to an end. With solid arguments, the brainwashing like fake propaganda of the powerful European lobby to be disenchanted.

For yet the zurollende on European disaster could (which is currently held only by the cheap flood of money in chess) away. But this can only succeed if our continent awakened from its slumber and EU citizens can not be lulled longer and learn to distinguish fiction and reality another. I certainly have done with this book my duty. There shall not say in hindsight that he can not know it all.


Background and analysis:
In Germany wages have been falling since 1980. Why?
Germany: The brazen proclamation of skills shortage!
Globalization: the ignorance of the facts
The political and economic consequences of an brexit An analytical consideration from German view.
"We have to explain Europe better!"
When will the Dexit? (the withdrawal of Germany from the EU)
The capitalist Powers Act
Globalization: "One cannot produce that with us anymore!"
The fairy tale of the international division of labor
The international division of labor is counterproductive!
The fear of British Farmers before the Brexit!
The impact of globalization on developing countries
Brainwashing: "We want an open Europe!"
How much democracy can withstand the EU?
Should the EU become a political union, new problems arise!
Is there indeed a general market saturation?


Ist die Globalisierung Basis unseres Wohlstandes?
Und leben wir auf Kosten der anderen?

(Eingangsseite www.anti-globalisierung.de)


© Manfred Julius Müller, Flensburg, october 2017

Current books by Manfred Julius Müller (unfortunately currently only available in German):
THE CAPITAL and the world economic crises - only Euro 5.80
THE CAPITAL and the welfare state - only Euro 7.90
OUT OF THE EU or persevere until the sinking? - only Euro 5,90
The free trade delusion - only Euro 6.50
Humanity knows no boundaries. Stupidity, but not too! - only Euro 6.80
Only Fairtrade! The capitalist Reformation! 35 theses for a fairer world! - only 5,- Euro

Manfred Julius Müller has analyzed global economic processes for more than 30 years. He is the author of various books on the topics of globalization, capitalism and politics. Some texts by Manfred Julius Müller also found their way into textbooks or are used for teacher training.

The analyzes and texts by Manfred Julius Müller are non-partisan and independent!
They are not, as is often the case, sponsored by state institutions, global players, corporations, associations, political parties, trade unions, the EU or capital lobby!